It would take a literal miracle, however.
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
walkawayarchie |
|||
|
If we ever get to escape this county and end up moving closer to school, there are at least three that I know of over there- including a nice rifle range.
It would take a literal miracle, however. |
|||
Taco Fred |
|||
Lutherius wrote: I went to Eagle Creek on the Northwest side of Indy on Sunday. It is a pretty decent pistol range under cover even though it is outdoors. They have a website as well. It costs 20 bucks, though. I have heard good things about the Wibur Wright range in New Castle. It is free and they have a rifle range also. I would like to check it out soon. It just gets too cold in Indiana to be outside shooting during the winter. There a could of indoor ranges I know of here, but there is usually a long wait in the winter. |
|||
tandc90 |
|||
|
Twenty dollars? I thought Bass Pro was expensive at ten. What do I know.
|
|||
Neo |
|||
|
It troubles me that one of the most advanced, free and richest nations in the world has one of the highest homocide and violent crime rates.
I am guessing that nobody on this board would be for unrestrained gun ownership. Wouldnt you like to see people with a violent criminal history, under 18s, and people with mental illness disqualified from owning guns? From what I gather, there are a lot of states in the US that do just that. But because it is not uniform across the country it is really easy for anybody to buy a gun, at a gun show over the border for instance. What you really need over there is uniform gun laws. In Australia we are allowed to own guns but have to have a licence and belong to a registered gun club. The three catagories mentioned above are disqualified. It is the same across the country, I cant go to another state and bypass the laws. |
|||
walkawayarchie |
|||
|
Neo, the laws are already in place against criminals and "mentally ill people" (and could PTSD be considered a mental illness?) owning guns.
They've been there for years.
|
|||
blackdog |
|||
|
Actually, there's a specific list of disorders in the cases of most of those laws...and I've never seen PTSD mentioned (I worked at walmart 8-9 years
ago and since I covered breaks for sporting goods I had to know what the laws for my state are) not only that, but if it doesn't come up in the background
check (i.e. if the person hasn't been committed or recived court ordered psychiatric care) its up to the discretion of the seller weather or not to sell a
gun to the person.
Unfortunately, that's why every so often you get a crazy person buying a gun legally and killing themselves or others. It sucks, but my answer (that the people selling the guns will use their brains) is the one people rarely use. I'm NOT a big gun control advocate...because I find that most people who support gun control and especially the gun control nuts either are actively wanting to force their will on others or they are looking for a lazy way to solve some of society's problems. I don't exactly agree with the NRA all the time...but I flat out don't trust gun control nuts. |
|||
tandc90 |
|||
It troubles me that one of the most advanced, free and richest nations in the world has one of the highest homocide and violent crime rates. But you see we don't have a problem. What we have are a very few specific areas with extremely violent crime rates that make it appear America has a nation-wide problem. The statistics from those areas are jumbled in with the millions of safe areas (most of America) to make it look like the whole country is dangerous. It's like a whole city being judged based on the bad part of town alone. It's a completely inaccurate judgment if ninety percent of that city is safe but people are told it's dangerous based on two dangerous streets. |
|||
phaedrus |
|||
tandc90 wrote: In NW Florida, we just kinda pick a target...... Range?! We don't need no stinkin' range! Seriously, though, most of the people I know generally do just go off in the woods somewhere. Of course that's getting more and more difficult as land is being "closed" and only open in hunting "leases". Strange, really. All that woodland out there and you'd be trespassing if you wandered through most of it. When I was a kid, it wasn't a problem - landowners didn't care. Then someone got the idea of a "hunting lease" and it was all down hill from there. |
|||
phaedrus |
|||
|
But, back on topic, the whole idea of guns in church is really oxymoronic in my opinion. If churchgoers actually read their bibles, they'd know
this.
|
|||
Conservatarian |
|||
walkawayarchie wrote:
But, back on topic, the whole idea of guns in church is really oxymoronic in my opinion. If churchgoers actually read their bibles, they'd know this.Actually, in Plymouth, bringing a gun to church was manatory. "The Church Building. The church building itself had no significance to the Pilgrims, and was kept intentionally drab and plain, with no religious depictions, crosses, windows, fancy architecture, or icons, to avoid the sin of idolatry. At Plymouth, the Pilgrim's church was the bottom floor of the town's fort--the top floor held six cannons and a watchtower to defend the colony. The church room was also the town's meetinghouse, where court sessions and town meetings took place. Isaac de Rasieres, who visited Plymouth in 1627, reported how the Pilgrim's began their church on Sunday: "They assemble by beat of drum, each with his musket or firelock, in front of the captain's door; they have their cloaks on, and place themselves in order, three abreast, and are led by a sergeant without beat of drum. Behind comes the governor, in a long robe; beside him on the right hand, comes the preacher with his cloak on, and on the left hand, the captain with his side-arms and cloak on, and with a small cane in his hand; and so they march in good order, and each sets his arms down near him." During the early years of Plymouth, failing to bring your gun to church was an offense for which you could be fined 12 pence." http://www.mayflowerhistory.com/History/plymoth7.php |
|||
walkawayarchie |
|||
|
Blasted Yuko ate my post, and I have to repeat...
Whoa- I LOVE those pictures... and I'd bet that I know what their subject is about- happened in Georgia, right??? That is an interesting tidbit about the Pilgrims. I've read some of their writings- and don't generally hold a high opinion of them. (Some of them were ancestors on my "white side".) |
|||
Taco Fred |
|||
tandc90 wrote:You can buy a 10 visit pass for 65 bucks. But just a lone visit will set you back 20. |
|||
msc.formercatholics... |
|||
|
It is interesting they need to bring firearms into the congregation yet tongues of fire are not even normative in each of their meetings. They should be
pentecostal to the full degree...tongues of fire included. They say "Well, those tongues of fire were only on Pentecost, but not now." So why be
pentecostal when the tongues of fire only happened on the day of Pentecost?
|
|||